$B9b;3
$B$N56AuO@J8$r8x3+(B
Quantity Yamamori's
ignorant camouflage
paper is exhibited.
$B99$K!"?@$,;XE&$9$k(B
$B9b;3!!
|
$BF|K\E/3X2qJTE/3X#N#O#5#8$N!"9b;3
Camouflage paper public presentation of the Mamoru Takayama Philosophical
Association of Japan chairman of the philosophy NO58 edited by the
Philosophical Association of Japan
$B!J%7%s%]%8%&%`!'(BT-$B-!E/3X$H$O$$$+$J$k1D$_$+!)(B$B!]!VE/3X!W$H!V%U%#%m%=%U%#%d!W$N4V!KI,A3@-!&6vA3@-!"$=$7$F<+M3!<(B$B!VE/3X$H$O$$$+$J$k1D$_$+!W(B$B$K8~$1$F(B
(Symposium: T-(1) philosophy is what kind of business or ? - Between
"philosophy" and "$B%U%#%m%=%U%#%d(Bs") Turn to necessity,
contingency, and freedom - "what kind of business is philosophy?"
$B!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!9b;3
Quantity Yamamori
(University of Tokyo)
$B!VE/3X$H$O$$$+$J$k1D$_$+!W(B$B$H$NLd$$$KEz$($?$$!#$H$9$l$P!"$*$*$`$MFs$D$NJ}ES$,$"$m$&!#$R$H$D$O!"$3$l$^$GE/3X$HB*$($i$l$F$-$?!"8=Be$b4^$a$?Nr;K>e$N$b$m$b$m$N1D$_$rD;bW$7!"$=$l$K$h$C$F$3$NLd$$$KEz$($k$H$$$&!"$$$&$J$i$P(B$BD;bWE*4QE@(B$B$+$i$N$b$N$G$"$k!#(B
I want to reply to the question "what kind of business it is with
philosophy." Then, there will be two $BJ}ES(B in general. If one looks down at
philosophy and the caught business of everything in history also including
the present age until now, and it is said by it that it replies to this
question and it is said, it will be a thing from a bird's-eye view-viewpoint.
T-$B-!(B$B!"E/3X$H$O(B$B!V:2$,L58B$N@$3&$+$i!"?4$KAw$C$FMh$k8@MU$NCN7C!W(B$B$,4pK\$G$"$j!"E/3X$N7A<)>e3X$r8&5f$7$F!"(B$B!V:2$NB8:_$rH]Dj!W(B$B$9$k9b;3$B!V??M}$NE/3X!W(B$B$r2rL@$9$k$3$H$O!"1J1s$KIT2DG=$G$"$k!#(B
T-(1) and philosophy cannot solve "philosophy of truth" forever to
quantity Yamamori to whom "the wisdom of the language sent to the heart
from the world where a soul is infinite" is foundations, and studies and
carries out "denying existence of a soul" of the philosophical
metaphysics.
$B$b$&$R$H$D$O!"$3$l$^$G$KE/3X$N=EMWLdBj$HB*$($i$l$F$-$?!"$=$N0l$D!"$b$7$/$O!"$$$/$D$+$r8+?x$(!"T-$B-"E/3XFb:_E*(B$B$J4QE@$+$i$N$b$N$G$"$k!#(B
it is said that it replies to the question, another gazing at a philosophical
important question, its one caught, or some until now, and actually
developing the problem -- so to speak -- T-(2) philosophy -- it is a thing
from an immanent viewpoint.
$B$3$3$G;n$_$?$$$H;W$&$N$O8e
The latter wants to try here. And . to gaze at.
T-$B-"!"E/3XFb:_E*4QE@(B$B$K$D$$$F$b!"(B$B!V:2$,?4$KI|3h$9$k8=$B$KL5CN$J9b;3$B!V??M}$NE/3X!W(B$B$r2rL@$9$k$3$H$OIT2DG=$G$"$k!#(B
Even if it will study philosophy also about T-(2) and a philosophy immanent
viewpoint in 100 to quantity Yamamori ignorant to "the reality which a
soul revitalizes to the heart", it is impossible to solve
"philosophy of truth" absolutely.
$B!V:2$NB8:_$r8,5u$KG'$a!W(B$B!":2$H$O$I$N$h$&$J$b$N$G!":2$+$i$N8@MU$O!"$I$N$h$&$KAw$i$l$FMh$k$+$r8&5f$9$k5AL3$r2L$?$5$J$$8B$j!"E/3X
"It being a private seal humbly about existence of a soul" and a
soul are what kind of things, and unless duty to study how the language from
a soul is sent is done, it is sure that the right as a philosopher is
snatched.
T-$B-#=EMWLdBj$O!"I,A3@-$H<+M3!"$=$7$F!"6vA3@-$NLdBj(B$B$G$"$k!#$H$$$&$N$b!"$3$NLdBj$r@53N$K8+DL$9$3$H$K$h$C$F!"$o$l$o$l$,$=$N$&$A$KB8$7$F$$$k@$3&$N!"$"$k$$$O!"@$3&$N$&$A$KB8$7$F$$$k$o$l$o$l<+?H$N!"$$$&$J$i$P4pK\E*$J$"$jJ}$,L@NF$KIb$-D&$j$K$5$l$&$k$H;W$o$l$k$+$i$G$"$k!#(B
T-$B-#(B Important questions are necessity, freedom, and a contingent problem.
that is, the thing for which this problem is foreseen correctly -- us --
among those, we themselves who are alike and consist in the inside in the
world which consists, or the world say -- it is because it will seem that it
gets that the fundamental way that should be is thrown into relief clearly if
it becomes.
$B$$$&$^$G$b$J$/$=$N$3$H$,$^$?!"(B$BE/3X$J$k$b$N$,$I$&$$$&1D$_$G$"$k$N$+$r9M$($k(B$B$&$($G!"9%E,$J2
It is expected that it can become a suitable ground when that, needless to
say, considers what kind of business so-called philosophy is again.
T-$B-#!"D;bWE*4QE@(B$B!J9b$$$H$3$m$+$i8+2<$m$9!K$H$+!"(B$B-#(B$BI,A3@-!JI,$:$=$&$J$k2DG=@-!K$H$+!"6vA3@-!J860x$,$o$+$i$J$$$G5/$3$k$3$H!KEy$N!"Fq$7$$F|K\8l$rO@J8$KMeNs$9$k!"ElBg<056AuO@J8$O!"0UL#ITL@$JO@J8$G$"$k!#(B
The University of Tokyo type camouflage paper which enumerates in a paper
T-(3), a bird's-eye view-viewpoint (it looks down from a high place), (3)
necessity (a possibility of surely becoming so), and difficult Japanese, such
as contingency (happen without knowing a cause), is an incomprehensible
paper.
$B@$3&$NE/3X8&5f$K5U$i$&$b$N$G$"$j!"<+J,$N4{F@8"$r$B!VYTB$1#JC:>5=O@J8!W(B$B$G$"$k!#(B
It is the "fabrication concealment fraud paper" for opposing
philosophy research in the world, protecting one's vested rights, and hiding
ignorance.
$B#1!"(B
$B$5$F!"(BT-$B-$!"$h$/CN$i$l$F$$$k$h$&$K(B$B!"(B
now, T-(4) -- it is known well -- as
T-$B-$!"!V$h$/CN$i$l$F$$$k$h$&$K!W(B$B$3$N8@MU$O!";d$,F|K\$N:>5=E/3X5==8CD!"F|K\E/3X2q$G$O!"(B$B!VL5CN$G56Au$5$l$?8@MU$,!">o<12=!W(B$B$5$l$F$7$^$C$F$$$k$i$7$$!#(B
T-(4) -- "-- it is known well -- as -- " -- after I decode a
Japanese fraud philosopher's camouflage paper and start, I am the 2nd time,
but seemingly, "the ignorant and camouflaged language is common
sense-ization" of this language will be carried out in a camouflage
fraud ring and the Philosophical Association of Japan.
$B$3$N8@MU$O!":#8e56AuO@J8$KB?$/=P$FMh$k$H;W$&$,!"#12sL\$OElBgE/3X8&5f<<$N0';"J8$G$"$k!#(B
Although it thinks that this language comes out in a camouflage paper mostly
[ from now on ], the 1st time is the greeting sentence of the University of
Tokyo philosophy laboratory.
$B!v(B$BE/3X$N8l8;$,40A4$KL5CN$JElBgE/3X8&5f<<(B
$B!v(B$BE/3X$N8l8;!V?M4V0&!W$H!V:2$+$i$N8@MU$NCN7C!W$KL5CN$J!!9b;3!!
$B$3$N$h$&$KE/3X$N8l8;!J(BPhilosophy)$B$9$i56Au$5$l$F!"8l8;$N0UL#$9$iM}2r$G$-$J$$!"E/3X$KL5CN$J!"%=%U%#%9%H9b;3!!
Thus, philosophically ignorant sophist Takayama which even the philosophical
origin of a word (Philosophy) is camouflaged, and cannot understand even the
meaning of the origin of a word
$B
$BE/3X$H$$$&3XLd$,CB@8$7$?!"!X8l8;(B(Philosophy)$B!Y$9$i!"M}2r!"2r5=E/3X
Camouflage fraud philosopher to whom learning called philosophy was born and
who cannot understand and interpret "the origin of a word
(Philosophy)" Why is
the right as a philosopher in quantity Yamamori?
T-$B-%%R%e!<%`$K$h$C$FFHCG$N$^$I$m$_$rGK$i$l$?%+%s%H$,!"L\3P$a$?L\$G8+Dj$a$h$&$H$7$?$3$H$O$[$+$G$b$J$$!"(B$BI,A3@-$9$J$o$A(B
T-$B-%(B the necessity that it is not the others which Kant who had a doze of the
dogma broken by Hume tried to discern by the eye which woke up, either --
namely
T$B!]-%%R%e!<%`$K$h$C$FFHCG$N$^$I$m$_$rGK$i$l$?%+%s%H$,!"L\3P$a$?L\$G8+Dj$a$h$&$H$7$?$3$H$O$[$+$G$b$J$$!"(B
T-$B-%(B It is not the others which Kant who had a doze of the dogma broken by
Hume tried to discern by the eye which woke up, either,
$BL>$bCN$l$F$$$J$$!"E/3X$B!V%+%s%H$N?4$N??M}$r2rL@$7$?E/3X!W(B$B$O!"%R%e!<%`$4$H$-$N1F6A$r$B!V?4$N??M}!W(B$B$N2rL@$G$"$k!#(B
philosopher Hume to whom a name has not become known, either -- Takayama the philosophy which resolved
but that the truth of "Kant's heart knew $B
$B;29M$N$?$a$K!"%+%s%H$O!"%9%&%'!<%G%s%\%k%0$NBN83E/3X$r!":G=i$OHcH=$7$F$$$?$,!"8eH>$G!V%9%&%'!<%G%s%\%k%0$NE/3X$O!"46@-3&$G$O$J$/1QCN3&$G$"$k!W$H>^;?$7$F$$$k!#(B
For reference, although Kant was criticizing Swedenborg's experience
philosophy at first, he has praised Swedenborg's philosophy for "Being
not a sensitivity community but a wisdom community" in the second half.
$B!J(BWikipedia$B!K%$%^%L%(%k!&%+%s%H$N@836!J8eG/!!%+%s%H$O%(%^%L%(%k!&%9%&!+%'!<%G%s%\%j$K$D$$$F:G=*E*$K$3$&=R$Y$F$$$k!V%9%&!+%'!<%G%s%\%j$N;WA[$O?r9b$G$"$k!#Nn3&$OFCJL$J!"
(Wikipedia) Immanuel Kant's whole life (the thought of "Swedenborg
whom Kant has finally told
Emmanuel Swedenborg like this in after years is noble-minded.) It is the
wisdom community where the world of spirits is special and where the realistic
universe is constituted and this realistic universe must be distinguished
from a sensitivity community."
$B#T!]-&0x2LI,A3@-(B$B$H(B$B#T!]-'<+M3(B$B$H$N4X78$G$"$C$?!#(B
T-$B-&(B It was the relation between unfortunate necessity and T-(7) freedom.
T$B!]-&0x2LI,A3@-(B
T-$B-&(B Unfortunate necessity
$B<-=q$G$O!"0x2LN'!J$$$s$,$j$D!K!LE/!MJ*;v$O$9$Y$F860x$,$J$/$F$O@8$8$J$$$H$$$&K!B'$H=P$F$$$k!#(B
In the dictionary, things [ law-of-causality (although it is absent $B$j$D(B) [$BE/(B] ]
have all come out with the law of not being generated if there is no cause.
$B%=%/%i%F%9$NB9Do;R!"%"%j%9%H%F%l%9$O!"(B$B!V860x$H7k2L!W(B$B$G!"E/3X$H$$$&3XLd$,!"B8:_$9$k7k2L$,!":_$k0J>e!"(B$B!V860x$OI,$:B8:_!W(B$B$9$k$H$7$F!"7A<)>e3X!J:2$NB8:_$r>ZL@!K$r2r$$$?$N$G$"$k!#(B
Socrates's pupil's pupil and Aristotle were "as a result of the
cause", and they dispelled metaphysics (existence of a soul is proved)
noting that they did "a cause is surely existence", since they had
the result in which learning called philosophy exists.
$B%"%j%9%H%F%l%9$O!"(B$B!V:2$NB8:_$r2rL@!W(B$B$9$k;v$G!"@$3&$NB?$/$N?M$?$A$KL>$NCN$l$?E/3X
Aristotle is carrying out "solving existence of a soul", and became
the philosopher as whom the name became known to many people in the world.
$B8e$NJ}$G=q$/$,!"9b;3$B!V860x$H7k2L!W(B$B$N0UL#$,40A4$KM}2r$,$G$-$F$$$J$N$,8=
Although quantity Yamamori is meaningless and illustrates unfortunate
necessity, although written in the direction of the back, and explained at
full length, an understanding of the meaning as a result of [ of Aristotle ]
"a cause and as a result of" is completely possible, and $B$F$$(B is
actual.
$B;Q!&7A$NL5$$2J3X$GB,Dj$G$-$J$$!V:2$NB8:_$r8&5f!W(B$B$3$=$,9b;3
It is the duty of quantity Yamamori's last "to study existence of a
soul". [ which cannot be measured by science without a form ]
T$B!]-'@$3&$O3N8G$H$7$?0x2LI,A3@-$N$b$H$K$J$1$l$P$J$i$J$$!#(B$B$7$+$7!"$=$&$J$k$H!"(B$B#T!]-'?M4V$N<+M3(B$B$H$$$&$b$N$,!"$3$N@$3&$+$iDy$a=P$5$l$F$7$^$&!#(B
T-$B-'(B There must be the world in the basis of steadfast unfortunate necessity.
However, if it becomes so, the thing that a T-(7) human being is free will be
excluded from this world.
$B#T!]-'?M4V$N<+M3!#(B$B9b;3N)$5$;$h$&$H$7$F$$$k$,!"E/3XH/>M$N860x$G$"$k!"(B$B!V:2$NB8:_$rH]Dj!W(B$B$7$F!"E/3X$N8&5f$r$9$k$3$H$O!"(B$B!V:2$,?4$KAw$C$FMh$k8@MU$NCN7C!W(B$B$rH]Dj$9$k$3$H$G!"(B$B!VE/3X$N8l8;$NCN7C!W(B$B$K!"H?$7E7COAOB$$N?@$NE/3X$KH?$9$k9T0Y$G$"$k!#(B
T-$B-'(B Man's freedom. Carrying out "denying existence of a soul",
although quantity Yamamori's is going to reconcile "the law of cause and
effect" and the freedom of philosophy research, and studying philosophy
is denying "the wisdom of the language which a soul sends to the
heart", and it is an act which is contrary to "the wisdom of the
philosophical origin of a word", and is contrary to the philosophy of
God of the Creation. [ which is the cause of philosophy origin ]
$B9b;3Z5r$H$J$k!#!J:[H=;~>Z5r$H$7$FDs=P!K(B
The paper of quantity Yamamori's fabrication philosophy becomes philosophy
with a completely ignorant proof. (It submits as a proof at the time of a
trial)
$BE/3X$N4pK\$G$"$k(B$B!V8l8;$KL5CN!W(B$B$GE/3X$r8&5f$9$k$3$H$O!"(B$B!V??M}$NE/3X8&5f$NK832!W(B$B$G$"$j!"EvA3E/3X
The thing which is philosophical foundations and for which philosophy is
studied by "it is ignorance to the origin of a word" is
"disturbance of philosophy research of truth", and, naturally the
right and freedom as a philosopher must be snatched.
$B#T!]-(N>N)IT2DG=(B$BFsN'GXH?!!(BAntimony$B$J$N$@$+$i$G$"$k!#(B
T-$B-((B It is because it is coexistence impossible #.
$B$G$O!"$I$&$9$k$N$+!#$3$NLdBj$,%+%s%HE/3X$N86E@$G$"$C$?!#(B
What does it do? This problem was the starting point of a Kantianism.
$B$`$m$s$3$NLdBj$O$b$H$h$j8E$/$F!"$^$?!"?7$7$$!#(B
Of course, this problem is old from the first, and new.
T$B!]-(N>N)IT2DG=!J%"%s%A%b%K!$B%G%+%k%HE/3X$N@8L?5!G=$N??M}!V?4?HFs85!W$KL5CN$J!"M#G>O@
T-$B-((B Coexistence is impossible (antimony). the truth "mind and body of
the life function of the Descartes philosophy -- duality -- " -- the
language by means of which the ignorant philosopher of the critic supporting $BM#G>(B
is doing the incorrect interpretation most is Kant's "antimony"
(antimony).
$B<-=q$G$O!"!VFsN'GXH?!W!J$K$j$D$O$$$O$s!K8_$$$KH?BP!&L7=b$9$kFs$D$NL?Bj$,!"F1;~$KF1Ey$N8"Mx$G
a dictionary -- "antimony" two propositions which oppose and are mutually
contradictory should be simultaneously asserted with an equivalent right.
Pains were taken to have come out, and for me study philosophy, and
understand and interpret the meaning of this language most.
$B$7$+$7!"(B$B!V:2$+$i$N8@MU$NCN7C!W(B$B$K$h$C$F!"2rL@$7$?!"%+%s%H$N!VFsN'GXH?!W$H$O!"%+%s%H$,!V?4$N??M}!W!J46@-3&!K$r8+;v$K2rL@$7$F$$$k!"%+%s%HE/3X$+$iH=CG$9$k$H!"%G%+%k%HE/3X$N!V?4?HFs85!W$G$"$k??M}$rH/8+$7$?$N$G$9!#(B
if Kant judges "truth of the heart" (sensitivity community) to be
Kant's solved "antimony" from the Kantianism currently solved
splendidly by however, the wisdom of the language from "soul" --
"mind and body of the Descartes philosophy -- duality -- " -- it is
-- truth was discovered.
$B!V?4$N??M}!W$KL5CN$J!"9b;3N)IT2DG=$HM}2r!"2r
He is the ignorant sophist philosopher who cannot understand the meaning of
"antimony" of Kant, either, but interprets [ who interprets and
understands that coexistence with sufficient convenience of it is impossible
] it as the method of understanding language intellectually by study, to
quantity Yamamori ignorant in "truth of the heart" since it is
ignorant to the difference in the sensitivity (feeling consciousness
function) of the heart "which takes in language by experience by the heart."
$B%=%/%i%F%9$d%G%+%k%H!"$=$7$F%+%s%H$H@>ED4vB?O:$^$G$,2rL@$7$F$$$k!"@8L?5!G=$N??M}!V?4$HFyBN$N0c$$!W$KL5CN$J!"9b;3
Kant's "antimony" cannot solve to quantity Yamamori ignorant in the
truth "a difference between the heart and flesh" of a life function
whom even Socrates, Descartes and Kant, and the Kitarou Nishida are solving.
$B#T!]-)8E$/$O!"%9%H%"GI$N5DO@$K$^$G$5$+$N$\$j$&$k$@$m$&$+!#(B$B$^$?!"Am$8$FI,A3@-$H<+M3$H$$$&4QE@$+$i8+$l$P!"(B
T-$B-)(B Can it go back even to an argument of a store group in ancient times? Moreover,
it is if it sees from a viewpoint that it is as free as necessity generally,
T-$B-)!!8E$/$O!"%9%H%"!$B9b;3pJs$N;~Be$K!"E/3X$NGIH6$,B8:_$9$k$3$H;vBV$,LdBj$G$"$k!#(B
T-$B-)(B Do go back even to an
argument of a store group in ancient times? Although quantity Yamamori is
ignorant in philosophical truth, and it is going to go back to the faction of
the philosophy of the Greek era and is going to argue, the existing [ a philosophical
faction ]-in time of information on the Internet situation is a problem.
$B5lBV0MA3$NGIH6$NE/3X8&5f$K$h$C$F!"F|K\$G8=ED4vB?O:$N!"5.=E$J??M}$NE/3X$r!"ElBg$O!"0U?^E*$KL5;k$7$F$$$k!#(B
By unchanging factional philosophy research, the University of Tokyo has
ignored intentionally the philosophy of precious truth of the Kitarou Nishida
which considered encounter experience as the soul actually in Japan.
$B#T!]-*%-%j%9%H65$,$3$NLdBj7w$N$&$A$K$"$j!"$5$i$K$O!"%.%j%7%"Ha7`$,$3$NLdBj$r!"(B$B$=$NJ%8;$H$7$?!#E>$8$F8=Be$K$*$$$F!"I,A3@-$b$7$/$O0x2LI,A3@-$H<+M3$H$N>WFM$H$$$&!"$3$NLdBj$,!"$^$5$K0l$D$N:G@hC<$NLdBj$G$"$k$H$$$&$3$H$O!"$o$l$o$l0l?M0l?M$,<+$i$r>J$_$k$3$H$K$*$$$F!"$?$@$A$KL@$i$+$H$J$m$&!#(B
T-$B-*(B Christianity is in the inside in this problem area, and the Greek tragedy
made this problem that $BJ%8;(B further. I will change and it will become clear
immediately in the present age that this problem [ say / the collision with
necessity or unfortunate necessity, and freedom ] is just the one latest
problem in we every person considering oneself.
$B$?$@!"$3$3$G;n$_$?$$$H;W$&$3$H$O!"$3$N8E$/$F?7$7$$LdBj$r!"4{B8$N8+J}$KB($7$F8!F$$9$k$H$$$&$3$H$G$O$J$$!#(B
However, something to try here is not being based on the existing view and
examining this old and new problem.
$B$=$&$G$O$J$/$=$l$O!"(B$B$3$NLdBj$,$B#T!]-+(B$BC1=c$J;W$$9~$_$K0M$C$F$$$k$N$G$O$J$$$+$H$$$&!"$"$k:,K\$+$i$NHcH=E*9M;!$J$N$G$"$k!#(B
that is not right -- it -- this problem -- in fact -- certain T-(11) -- it is
critical consideration from a certain origin whether therefore to be in a
simple belief.
$B$=$N;W$$9~$_$H$O!"$"$i$+$8$a4JC1$K8@$C$F$7$^$($P!"MW$9$k$KI,A3$H<+M3$H$ON>N)$7$J$$$H$$$&;W$$9~$_$G$"$k!#(B
The belief will be a belief that freedom is incompatible in in short it being
necessary, if it says simply beforehand.
$B$3$N;W$$9~$_$3$=$,B`$1$i$l$J$1$l$P$J$i$J$$$N$G$"$k!#
Just this belief must be turned down. Actually $B!"(B
T-$B-*!!%-%j%9%H65$,$3$NLdBj7w$N$&$A$K$"$j!"$5$i$K$O!"%.%j%7%"Ha7`$,$3$NLdBj$r!"$=$N0l$DJ%8;!J$U$A$2$s!K$H$7$?!#(B
T-$B-*(B Christianity is in the
inside in this problem area, and the Greek tragedy made this problem that one
$BJ%8;(B ($B$U$A$2$s(B) further.
$B9b;3e3X!"$H?@3X$N2?$rCN$C$F$$$k$H$$$&$N$+!"$"$^$j$K$b(B$B!V??M}$NE/3X$KL5CN!W(B$B$J!"F|K\E/3X2q$N2qD9$G$"$j!"L5CN$N<+3P$HH?>J$r6/$/5a$a$k$b$N$G$"$k!#(B
Christ and Socrates are the chairmen of the Philosophical Association of
Japan ignorant in "existence of the soul which carried out encounter
experience" and too "ignorant to the philosophy of truth" in
whether it says what [ of two persons' metaphysics, and theology ] is known,
and quantity Yamamori asks for ignorant consciousness and reflection
strongly.
$B#T!]-+(B$B$3$NLdBj$,
T-$B-+(B It is critical consideration from a certain origin whether therefore this
problem is in a certain "simple belief" in fact.
$B$3$3$G!"9b;3$B!VC1=c$J;W$$9~$_!W(B$B$H!"ElBg<056AuE/3X$N:,K\!VE/3XH/>M$N5/8;!J:2$NB8:_!K$r!"0U?^E*$KL5;k!W$7$F$$$k(B$B!V56Au:>5=E/3X!W(B$B$r!"?4$N;W$$9~$_$N7g4Y$K65$(9~$^$l$?8=N)$7$J$$!WEy$H0UL#ITL@$NM}2r$r$7$F$7$^$C$F$$$k!#(B
Here, although, as for quantity Yamamori, it thought whether he would have
noticed actually that the defect of "a simple belief" and the
heart's belief of # which is carrying out the origin "the origin
(existence of a soul) of philosophy origin is disregarded intentionally"
of the University of Tokyo type camouflage philosophy was taught thoroughly,
he has done an incomprehensible understanding to "freedom is
incompatible in it being necessary" etc. .
$B#T!]-+5u?4C42{$K?H$N2s$j$K@8$8$F$$$k;vBV$rD/$a$F$_$l$P!"I,A3@-$H<+M3$H$,!"$=$7$F6vA3@-$H$,!"2?$NLdBj$b$J$/J;B8!JN>N)!K$7$F$$$k$N$G$"$k!#(B
T-$B-+(B If it looks at the situation produced in disinterested $BC42{(B at personal
appearance, any problem does not have necessity, freedom, and contingency,
and they coexist (coexistence)
.
$B6qBNE*$K9M;!$r;O$a$h$&!#(B
I will begin consideration concretely.
$B#T!]-+5u?4C32{!J$-$g$7$s$?$s$+$$!K(B$B<-=q$G$O!"!V?4$K$o$@$+$^$j$,$J$/!"$9$J$*$K?M$dJ*;v$KBP$9$k$3$H!#$H=P$F$$$k!#(B
T-$B-+(B A candid (is it $B$-$g$7$s$?$s(B?) dictionary "there are no vexations in the
heart and receive people and things obediently. It has come out.
$B9b;3$B!V<+J,$NL5CN$K5$$,IU$+$J$$!W(B$B!"40A4$K?4$,68$C$F!"GO<*ElIw!"GO$N<*$KG0J)$G!"?M$N0U8+$rJ9$+$J$$Mx8J
that quantity Yamamori's heart asks a partner for disinterested $BC32{(B, and does
not notice its ignorance", and the egoism sophist who the heart goes
wrong completely, are falling on deaf ears and in at one ear and out at the
other, and does not hear the opinion of people. [ "]
$B$7$+$b!"(B$B!V<+J,$NL5CN$K5$$,IU$+$J$$$G!"L5CN$N<+3P$bH?>J$bL5$$!W(B$B!";HL?46$r<:$$B;F@$N4{F@8"$r
And Mamoru Takayama who loses "there is neither ignorant consciousness
nor reflection without noticing their ignorance", and a sense of
mission, and protects the vested rights of profit and loss
$B#2(B
$B$^$:$O!"$4$/4JC1$JNc$K1h$C$F9M$($F$_$h$&!#$9$J$o$A!"(BT$B!<-,29EY$,0lDj$KJ]$?$l!"05NO$rJQ$($k$3$H$K$h$C$F$=$NBN@Q$,<+:_$KJQ2=$9$kL)JDMF4o$r9M$($F$_$k!#(B
I will think in accordance with a first of all very easy example. That is,
T-(12) temperature is kept constant and the volume considers the airtight
container which changes free by changing pressure.
$B$=$7$F$$$^!"$3$NMF4o$r4%Ag$7$?6u5$$G=<$?$9!"$H$9$k!#(B
And suppose that it fills with the air which dried this container now.
$B$9$k$H!"$3$3$K$*$$$F$O%\%$%k$NK!B'$b$7$/$O5$BN$N>uBVJ}Dx<0$,@.N)$7!"05NO$rFsG\$K$9$l$P!"I,A3E*$K5$BN$NBN@Q$OH>J,$K$J$k!#(B
Then, if the law of boil or a gaseous state equation is materialized in here
and pressure is doubled, gaseous volume will become half inevitably.
$B$^$?!"05NO$r;0G\$K$9$l$P!"I,A3E*$KBN@Q$O;0J,0l$K$J$j!";MG\$K$9$l$P;MJ,$N0l!"5U$K05NO$rH>J,$K$9$l$P!"5$BN$NBN@Q$OI,A3E*$KFsG\$K$J$k!#(B
Moreover, if pressure is increased 3 times, volume will be inevitably set to
1 for 3 minutes, and if it increases 4 times and pressure will be made 1/4
and a contrary at a half, gaseous volume will double inevitably.
T$B!<--$I$&$@$m$+!#$3$3$K$*$$$F!"I,A3@-$H<+M3$H!"$=$7$F6vA3@-$H$,!"2?$NLdBj$b$J$/J;B8!JN>N)!K$7$F$$$k$N$G$O$J$$$@$m$&$+!#(B
T-(13) -- it is how -- is it $B$m(B? In here, any problem does not have necessity,
freedom, and contingency, and, probably, they coexist (coexistence).
$B$9$J$o$A!"(BT$B!<-.;d$O$^$C$?$/<+M3$K5$BN$KBP$9$k05NOJQ2=$5$;$k$3$H$,$G$-$k(B$B!#$=$l$K$h$C$F!"5$BN$NBN@Q$r<+M3$KJQ$($k$3$H$,$G$-$k!#(B
namely, T-(14) -- I completely receive gas freely -- a pressure change can be
carried out. Gaseous volume is freely changeable with it. $B!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&(B
$B#3!"(B
T$B!<-/$3$N$h$&$J6vA3$HI,A3!"$=$7$F<+M3$N4X78$,!"N;2r:$Fq$J$b$N$G$"$k$H;W$o$l$k$N$O!"<+A3E*;vBV$NI,A3@-$,!"$^$5$K0x2LI,A3@-$HN;2r$5$l$k$+$i$G$"$k!#(B
T-(15) -- it is because it is just understood that the necessity of the
natural situation is unfortunate necessity that it such seems that
inevitability and the relation of freedom are difficult to understand in it
being accidental.
$B$9$J$o$A!"0lHL$KL\2<$NNc$O!"$3$&N;2r$5$l$h$&!#(B
That is, generally an example at present will be understood like this.
$B$^$:5$BN$KBP$9$k05NO$rFsG\$K$9$k$H!"$=$l$,860x$G!"$=$N7k2L!"5$BN$NBN@Q$O!"H>J,$K$J$k!"$H!#(B
Gaseous volume is as it being the cause, consequently becoming half, if the
pressure to gas is doubled first.
$B$=$7$F!"$3$3$K$*$$$F$O!"860x$,;~4VE*$K@h9T$7!"7k2L$O860x$KBP$7$F;~4VE*$K8eB3$9$k!"$H!#(B
And it is that a cause precedes in time and a result follows in time to a
cause in here.
$B$3$l$,!"$$$o$f$k0x2LO":?$H$$$&A[G0$G$"$k!#(B
This is the conception of the so-called causal chain. $B!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&(B
$B#4!"(B
T$B!<-/0x2LI,A3@-$NLdBj$r$b$&0l$D$NNc$K1h$C$F9M$($F$*$3$&!#(B$B$=$l$O!"%\!<%k$I$&$7$N>WFM$NNc$G$"$k!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&(B
$B#5!"(B
T$B!<-0$@$,
$B5$$D(B $B!+(B Although it was T-(16), in fact, Hume and Kant were in such a thing. $B!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&(B
$B#6!"(B
T$B!<-1OC$r$b$H$KLa$=$&!#MWE@$O!"DL>o$o$l$o$l$,0x2LE*I,A3@-$HN;2r$9$k$b$N$N
I will return the T-(17) talk. although we usually understand that the main
point is unfortunate necessity, the actual condition is kept perfect that it
can be that it is functional necessity. $B!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&(B
$B#7!"(B
T$B!<-2$5$FI,A3@-$H<+M3!"6vA3@-$r$a$0$j!"I,A3@-$NFb
I want to suppose that it goes to the question of "the same level as [
what kind of ] $B$$$H(B philosophy is" gradually, although the commutative
relevance of these situations is caught again, mentioning the reality of
necessity involving T-(18) now necessity, and freedom and contingency, being
based on this. $B!&!&!&!&!&!&(B
$B9b;3$B!VE/3XFb:_E*$J4QE@!W$+$i!VL5$N;kE@!W(B$B$KN)$C$F8&5f$9$k$H!"=q$$$F$*$-$J$,$i!"$B!VE/3X$N0x2LN'!W!JJ)65$G$O0x2L$NK!B'$H$$$&!K(B$B$K$D$$$F!"J*M}E*I=8=$K$h$C$F4X?t$^$G;}$A=P$7$F!"@bL@$7$F$$$k!#(B
quantity Yamamori -- the paper of the Philosophical Association of Japan --
it is -- "philosophy -- if it inquires from "a viewpoint of
nothing" from immanent viewpoint", physical expression will carry
out and explain "the philosophical law of causality" (in Buddhism,
it is called the law of cause and effect) to a function in fact, writing.
T$B!<-,!A-.(B$BL)JDMF4o$K05NO$r2C$($k$H$+!)(BT$B!<-/!A-2(B$B%S%j%d!<%I$N%\!<%k$NBG$DA0$H$+!"8e$H$+!"%"%j%9%H%F%l%9$,H/8+$7$?(B$B!V860x$H7k2L!W(B$B$r$/$I$/$I$H@bL@$7$F$$$k$,!"$J$<%"%j%9%H%F%l%9$,(B$B!V860x$H7k2L$G7A<)>e3X!W(B$B$r2r$$$?$N$+!"$<$s$<$sM}2r$7$F$$$J$$$N$,u$G$"$k!#(B
Although the back before it applies pressure to T-(12) - (14) airtight
container or the ball of ?T-(15) - (18) billiards strikes, and "the
cause and effect" which Aristotle discovered are explained at full
length, the actual condition does not understand at all why Aristotle solved
"a cause and it is metaphysics by a result."
$B!VE/3X$K40A4$KL5CN$J%=%U%#%9%H9b;3$B$HCGDj$7$?!#(B
"Philosophically completely ignorant sophist Mamoru Takayama" was
concluded.
$B;29M$N0Y$K!"%=%/%i%F%9$NB9Do;R!"%"%j%9%H%F%l%9$O!"!J%j%s%/!K!v(B$B!V(B$B%=%/%i%F%9$,Ax6xBN83!W$r$7$?(B$B!"(B$B!V;Q!&7A$NL5$$:2$r>ZL@!W(B$B$9$k0Y$K!"E/3X$H$$$&3XLd$,B8:_$9$k0J>e!J7k2L!K!"$3$NCO5e>e$KE/3X$N860x$G$"$k(B$B!V:2$NB8:_$r>ZL@!W(B$B$7$?$N$,!"(B$B!V%"%j%9%H%F%l%9$N7A<)>e3X!W(B$B$G$"$k!#(B
It is "Aristotle's metaphysics" that Socrates's pupil's pupil and
Aristotle did "to prove existence of a soul" on this earth if
learning called philosophy exists at all in order to carry out "to prove
a soul without a form", (link) * "# and (result) for reference. [
which is the philosophical cause ]
|
|